Monday, February 27, 2017

Weekly CAT Update 2/27

DATE: 2/27

MEETING TIME: 6:14pm

LOCATION: Kalkin
CAT MEMBERS PRESENT: Izzie, Dylan, Emily, Olivia

CAT MEMBER ROLES:
Facilitator: Dylan
Note Keeper/Publishing: Emily
Time Keeper: Olivia
Agenda Creator: Izzie



CAT WORK UPDATE:

A) What CAT tasks have you accomplished to date?
  • Met with Ben for 2 hours and got a full rundown on his vision, his journey, and experience with NGR thus far.
  • Acquired interview video of Dr. W around NGR and will prepare follow up questions if necessary.
  • Received reply from Ben with edited deliverables and goals. Feedback well received.
  • Created 6 Criteria for Excellence on Deliverable 1.
  • Viewed Dr. W Interview on Ben and took notes.
  • Identified value in creating a Communications Assets Map.
  • Communicated with Ben via lengthy email.
  • Began Communications Asset Report.
  • Kept in touch with Ben regarding action items.

B) What immediate and long-term CAT tasks lie ahead for the week, and who will execute?

  • Continuing Communications Asset Report
  • Becoming even more familiar with Ben's goals/mission for About page for website
  • Going over new resources from Ben and figuring out how to best utilize them


C) What was the most CHALLENGING element re: the past week's CAT work?
  • Reading and unpacking a very lengthy email from Ben
  • Awaiting tangible actionable items for our next steps 
  • Figuring out what to do with new resources sent from Ben

D) What was the most REWARDING element re: about his past week's CAT work?

  • Being on the same page with Ben: figuring out how he can best utilize our work
  • Working together to determine our next steps 


E) What is your CAT doing really well right now?

  • Staying on the same page: no one is being left behind


F) What is your CAT needing to work on right now?

  • Continue filling out Communications Asset Report 

Monday, February 13, 2017

Weekly CAT Update 2/13

DATE: 2/13

MEETING TIME: 6:20 PM

LOCATION: Kalkin
CAT MEMBERS PRESENT: Izzie, Dylan, Emily, & Olivia. 

CAT MEMBER ROLES:
Facilitator: Izzie
Note Keeper/Publisher: Olivia
Time Keeper: Dylan
Agenda Creator: Emily


CAT WORK UPDATE:

A) What CAT tasks have you accomplished to date? (use previous minutes)
  • Met with Ben for 2 hours and got a full rundown on his vision, his journey, and experience with NGR thus far.
  • Acquired interview video of Dr. W around NGR and will prepare follow up questions if necessary.
  • Received reply from Ben with edited deliverables and goals. Feedback well received.
  • Created 6 Criteria for Excellence on Deliverable 1.
  • Viewed Dr. W Interview on Ben and took notes.
  • Identified value in creating a Communications Assets Map.
  • Communicated with Ben via lengthy email.
B) What immediate and long-term CAT tasks lie ahead for the week, and who will execute?
  • Group effort in adding to Communications Asset Map (google doc in comments below)
  • Deliverable becoming clearer as we continue to touch base with Ben.
  • Communicate with advocacy groups to get on board with NGR's platform.
    • Potential: Vermont Brewers Association?
  • Blog post generation.
C) What was the most CHALLENGING element re: the past week's CAT work?
  • Understanding that this project will evolve as we go and we may not have a concrete direction throughout the process.
  • Not having additional interviews has been difficult, gleaning own understanding from video.
D) What was the most REWARDING element re: about the past week's CAT work?
  • Ben's enthusiasm to work with us.
  • Becoming more comfortable and competent on the organization and its goals.
E) What is your CAT doing really well right now?
  • Delegating work.
F) What is your CAT needing to work on right now?
  • Moving from planning into execution.

Excellence Checklist 2/13





  1. Create open line of contact between CAT team & Ben to ensure everyone is on the same page for what the vision is for content on site & media platforms.
  2. Complete Communications Asset Report on NGR website to determine clear SWOT analysis. This includes identifying a clear target audience. 
  3. Simplify and bring clarity to the NGR site/homepage so any visitor will understand organization.
  4. Aid Ben in partnering with 3 advocacy organizations.
  5. Identify 3-5 bills to profile to profile that are active in the legislature.
  6. Schedule 3 blog posts to complete on a profile of Ben, what the purpose of NGR really is, and listical/snackable post on how to inspire your friends and neighbors to contact their legislature. 

Dr. W NGR Interview

Dr. W Interview

  • ·      Benjamin Brown’s roots in VT: born and raised in Rutland
  • ·      Seventh-generation Vermonter
  • ·      Second-generation immigrant from Canada
  • ·      Worked in real estate industry when housing market fell apart
  • ·      Moved back to Vermont (from Colorado) with his then-fiance, now wife, to get back to their roots with the earth and practice farming in Vermont
  • ·      Activist citizen
  • ·      New Grass Roots: civic engagement platform (technological)
  • ·      Completely nonpartisan
  • ·      Here in Vermont, it can be difficult to get a hold of legislator, and if you do get through, there’s no mechanism to keep statistics on how many people have called each legislator
  • ·      Currently no data to represent how legislators are representing their constituents on specific issues
  • ·      New Grass Roots wants to fill the data void and use it to elevate the conversation/ figure out how healthy our democracy is
  • ·      180 legislators who serve the public at the state house in Montpelier: 150 House members, 30 Senators
  • ·      Fostering transparent communication between those 180 legislators and the people they serve
  • ·      Any Vermonter can visit the website, make a free account
  • ·      Hopes to turn into a financially viable business
  • ·      Currently exploring the model: examining what people and legislators want
  • ·      Main stakeholders: voters, advocacy organizations who tend to drive advocacy initiatives, legislators who are hearing from constituents
    • o   Adding value to all stakeholder groups
    • ·      Account sign-up: name, email, physical address, phone number
    • o   Can select any active piece of legislation, support or oppose it
    • o   Record 1-minute voice message for legislator
    • o   Can automate email message to legislator with link to audio file of voice message
  • ·      Want legislators to hear your voice, but on their own time/when they can get to it – as opposed to legislators dodging phone calls
  • ·      Individual callers can track the status of their messages
    • o   Email confirmation when message to legislator is sent
    • o   Email confirmation if/when message is listened to

What’s in it for legislators?

·      Often they’re not sure if who’s calling them a constituent or a non-constituent.
·      Prevents “astro-turfing”—lobbyists calling, organizations out of state



·      To contact your legislator: face to face in Montpelier, emailing, phone call (able to capture tone, other nonverbals, more personal nature)
·      NGR facilitates transparency through conversations
·      NGR takes privacy very seriously
·      Individuals can share their message on twitter if they wish to inspire neighbors, friends, advocates.
·      Anywhere online links can be shared
·      Stakeholding groups: citizens, legislators, and advocacy groups
·      Advocacy groups can aggregate supporters and use NGR
·      It’s a bipartisan…
·      Everything has to go through actual constituents
·      NGR puts math behind perception
·      “ Democracy tends to be controlled not by all eligible voters, but by those who show up to play ball” –Ben
·      Allows increased participation on a hyperlocal level
·      Are legislators voting in line with their constituents or voting with their own interests or in the interests of lobbyists

·      Vermonters have to go through multiple human beings to get in contact with legislators through phone calls



·      Tell us about where you are in the process of implementing NGR
o   Began at end of 2013
o   Been live delivering messages for the past couple years, working with advocacy organizations who brought NGR into their digital tools to push forward
o   Worked on cannabis, grocers and manufactures association, VBSR, main street alliance about family paid leave
o   Learned a lot about the process of digital tools- want to now build on the things we learned over the past few years
o   Because we facilitate messages on active legislation, last sessions legislation will go away and new will be introduced
·      So is NGR, your website, a place where you can kind of watch these issues go forward?
o   Yeah, it would be a great place to engage
o   Because we are non partisan, we don't take the main responsibility of educating folks on those issues
o   There are other ways of educating yourself on these issues- this is also the primary role of advocacy groups
o   When we work with organization if someone came to NGR we would connect them with the advocacy group who could give them that info- more curating and facilitating the info than giving them data
·      This is a show about VT independence, how do you see NGR facilitating a deeper conversation around what we often call resistance, resilience, sustainability for VTers in the 21st century- what role are you playing
o   Main thesis we have- very apparent in the recent election- 2016 election, bottom line people need to realize is no one is coming to save the day, so that means what do we do to solve the problems?
§  Up to us
§  Our democracy was founded on giving the government control to the people- so we want to facilitate this process
§  Why we focus on facilitating stats around specific issues- to give people a handle on what they want and the information to do it
§  People tend to focus on the personality of the candidates to be a catch all solution to everything
§  We have a citizen legislature, so I don't believe legislatures are meant to be the source of all solutions- they are meant to facilitate the will of the people
§  So what are the mechanics of the will of the people being conveyed to the legislature?
§  To have a conversation based on data and then determine how much things are wanted
·      If I am a legislature and I believe one thing and my constituents want something different than I have an obligation to them to represent the democratic will- that is a pretty powerful and clear will
o   To strengthen the bonds between them
o   The biggest value data can provide is trust
·      Trying to build trust between citizens and their government
o   Often times you’ll hear two sides in Montpelier claiming they have popular opinion on each side, and because there is no data anywhere to prove either side right or wrong, we simply don't know
·      At this point in democracy, and at this point in history, with the technology we have available it’s unacceptable.
·      When people talk about the popular opinion in a district, it’s based on whose spoken up, not on all eligible voters

·      Also can show VT how few people actually contact their legislatures




Would legislators be nervous about this (NGR)?
·      Legislators aren’t legally held to represent the popular will, so what is their job??
·      This is why data is so valuable.
·      Data allows us to prove whether or not the legislators vote with the minority or majority of their constituents
·      Allows us to open a conversation with the legislator, with verified numbers, on why they voted the way they did
·       “compel the legislator to dig deeper into their philosophy of a legislator, so that their constituents can better understand that legislator”  
·      Allows for dialogue with legislators***
·      More voice, more information, for legislators- transparency and more understanding of their constituents
·      Putting math behind the rhetoric
·      -sexy slogan- every voice counts, the art of democracy

(Next 6 mins discusses Ben’s views on political parties)